Episode 4 of 4

Re-evaluation as Whale Blubber

When
1986
Where
St. Augustine, Florida
Part of
St. Augustine Monster carcass washed ashore

Gennaro's 1986 histological examination found the tissue resembled octopus, while later analyses concluded the carcass was likely whale blubber.

In a 1986 issue of Cryptozoology, Gennaro carried out a comparative histological examination of the tissue and concluded that it most resembled contemporary octopus tissue. Later analyses tested the carcass for different amino acids, comparing results with tissues of a spotted dolphin, a beluga, a giant squid, and two octopus species. The samples were found to be masses of virtually pure collagen, lacking the biochemical characteristics of invertebrate collagen or the collagen fiber arrangement of octopus mantle, suggesting the remains of the skin of an enormous warm-blooded vertebrate. The authors concluded there is no evidence to support the existence of Octopus giganteus and concurred with Verrill (1897) and Lucas (1897) that the carcass was the remains of a whale, likely the entire skin or blubber layer.

Sources

  1. St. Augustine Monster Wikipedia, revision of 2026-05-29

Machine-drafted from the cited Wikipedia passages and checked by a reviewing model, not by a human editor. Every passage cites the revision it was written from; dates and places follow those passages.